Re: WIP: index support for regexp search

From: "Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: "Alexander Korotkov" <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas" <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tomas Vondra" <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: WIP: index support for regexp search
Date: 2012-12-18 08:51:45
Message-ID: e490ecadc15af75e0edc6a1d02db4d80.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, December 18, 2012 09:45, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
> You should use {0,n} to express from 0 to n occurences.
>

Thanks, but I know that of course. It's a testing program; and in the end robustness with
unexpected or even wrong input is as important as performance. (to put it bluntly, I am also
trying to get your patch to fall over ;-))

Thanks,

Erik Rijkers

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2012-12-18 09:06:02 Re: Enabling Checksums
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2012-12-18 08:45:27 Re: WIP: index support for regexp search