Re: Table partition for very large table

From: Yudie Gunawan <yudiepg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Table partition for very large table
Date: 2005-03-28 19:50:06
Message-ID: e460d0c050328115032b743f9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Hold on, let's diagnose the real problem before we look for solutions.
> What does explain <query> tell you? Have you analyzed the database?

This is the QUERY PLAN
Hash Left Join (cost=25.00..412868.31 rows=4979686 width=17)
Hash Cond: (("outer".groupnum = "inner".groupnum) AND
(("outer".sku)::text = ("inner".sku)::text))
Filter: (("inner".url IS NULL) OR (("inner".url)::text = ''::text))
-> Seq Scan on prdt_old mc (cost=0.00..288349.86 rows=4979686 width=17)
-> Hash (cost=20.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=78)
-> Seq Scan on prdt_new mi (cost=0.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=78)

> What are your postgresql.conf settings?

What suspected specific setting need to be changed?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2005-03-28 20:18:23 Re: Table partition for very large table
Previous Message Guy Rouillier 2005-03-28 19:43:03 Re: Debugging deadlocks