Re: [PATCHES] xpath_array with namespaces support

From: "Nikolay Samokhvalov" <nikolay(at)samokhvalov(dot)com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] xpath_array with namespaces support
Date: 2007-04-04 12:43:15
Message-ID: e431ff4c0704040543k54493aa7xbb14a9927657e2ac@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On 3/23/07, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Would it be better to use some more unlikely name for the dummy root
> > element used to process fragments than <x> ?
>
> Why do we even need to support xpath on fragments?
>

Why not? I find it useful and convenient.

--
Best regards,
Nikolay

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zoltan Boszormenyi 2007-04-04 12:44:50 Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch
Previous Message Markus Schiltknecht 2007-04-04 12:20:53 Re: Auto Partitioning

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zoltan Boszormenyi 2007-04-04 12:44:50 Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch
Previous Message Markus Schiltknecht 2007-04-04 12:20:53 Re: Auto Partitioning