On 3/23/07, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Would it be better to use some more unlikely name for the dummy root
> > element used to process fragments than <x> ?
>
> Why do we even need to support xpath on fragments?
>
Why not? I find it useful and convenient.
--
Best regards,
Nikolay