Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib

On 2/7/07, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:
> >
> > I still do not understand why is it so needed.
> > Your argument is "some apps aren't able to call functions as
> > schemaname.functionname(arg1, arg2, ..)", right?
>
> wrong.
>
> >
> > I still think that separate namespaces for extensions is a good idea
> > while adjusting search_path is not. I've explained my POV in details
> > several messages ago in this thread...
>
>
> The difference between us is that I am less inclined to be prescriptive
> about such matters than you are. I think that as namespace use expands
> we should also probably provide better support for adding things to the
> search path (or indeed taking things away). If you don't want to use it
> then don't, but I don't see why you are so insistent on denying such
> facilities to others.

ok, looks like I've misunderstood your mesages. Sorry for that. Surely
additional capabilities for manipulation with search_path cannot
hinder anybody.

--
Best regards,
Nikolay