From: | "Massa, Harald Armin" <chef(at)ghum(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Application name patch - v2 |
Date: | 2009-10-19 14:42:57 |
Message-ID: | e3e180dc0910190742i38b4bfb3jb0f0a61e3f8e3168@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Sure. Here's a nice example from SQL Server as well as related doc links:
>
> http://blog.benhall.me.uk/2007/10/sql-connection-application-name.html
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189770.aspx
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.data.sqlclient.sqlconnection.connectionstring%28VS.85%29.aspx
>
that looks as if the entry defaults to the application name (argv[0])
> Similar features are available in Oracle:
>
> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/appdev.920/a96612/d_appin2.htm
and I definitely know from Oracle, that the application name is the default
without the progammer / user issuing any SET command.
Would'nt this also make sense for PostgreSQL? That is, when no environment
is set, and no SET-command is issued, that the application name becomes the
default?
Harald
--
GHUM Harald Massa
persuadere et programmare
Harald Armin Massa
Spielberger Straße 49
70435 Stuttgart
0173/9409607
no fx, no carrier pigeon
-
%s is too gigantic of an industry to bend to the whims of reality
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-10-19 14:44:58 | Re: Application name patch - v2 |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-10-19 14:41:28 | Re: Application name patch - v2 |