Re: "type with xxxx does not exist" when doing ExecMemoize()

On 6/3/2024 10:10, Tender Wang wrote:
>
>
> Andrei Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru
> <mailto:a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>> 于2024年3月5日周二 17:36写道：
>
> On 1/3/2024 14:18, Tender Wang wrote:
> > During debug, I learned that numeric_add doesn't have type check
> like
> > rangetype, so aboved query will not report "type with xxx does
> not exist".
> >
> > And I realize that  the test case added by Andrei Lepikhov  in v3 is
> > right. So in v6 patch I add Andrei Lepikhov's test case.  Thanks
> a lot.
> >
> > Now I think the v6 version patch seems to be complete now.
> I've passed through the patch, and it looks okay. Although I am afraid
> of the same problems that future changes can cause and how to detect
> them, it works correctly.
>
>
> Thanks for reviewing it, and I add it to commitfest 2024-07.
I think, it is a bug. Should it be fixed (and back-patched) earlier?

--
regards,
Andrei Lepikhov
Postgres Professional