Re: Refactoring postmaster's code to cleanup after child exit

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Refactoring postmaster's code to cleanup after child exit
Date: 2024-09-10 22:35:35
Message-ID: e2lvootbrfb35ufugjdwwk77sa7ff6vyhaygtbdxwcnhmpjdkk@ankqkqknlrx7
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2024-09-10 13:33:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 12:59 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > I still think that we'd be better off to just return an error to the client in
> > postmaster, rather than deal with this dead-end children mess. That was
> > perhaps justified at some point, but now it seems to add way more complexity
> > than it's worth. And it's absurdly expensive to fork to return an error. Way
> > more expensive than just having postmaster send an error and close the socket.
>
> The tricky case is the one where the client write() -- or SSL_write() -- blocks.

Yea, SSL definitely does make it harder. But it's not exactly rocket science
to do non-blocking SSL connection establishment. After all, we do manage to
do so in libpq...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2024-09-10 22:38:38 Re: Use read streams in pg_visibility
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-09-10 22:33:31 Re: [PATCH] pg_stat_activity: make slow/hanging authentication more visible