Re: Some newbie questions

Thanks Shane for your response...

On Sep 7, 11:52 pm, pgsql(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz (Shane Ambler) wrote:
> > What is a good way to start understanding backend(postgres) code? Is
> > there any documentation available especially for developers?
>
> Most of the developer info is within comments in the code itself.
> Another place to start ishttp://www.postgresql.org/developer/coding
>
I have seen this link. But, I am looking(or hoping) for any design doc
or technical doc which details what is happening under the hoods as it
will save a lot of time to catchup the main stream.

> > What is commit log and why it is needed?
>
> To achieve ACID (Atomic, Consistent, Isolatable, Durable)
> The changes needed to complete a transaction are saved to the commit log
> and flushed to disk, then the data files are changed. If the power goes
> out during the data file modifications the commit log can be used to
> complete the changes without losing any data.

This, I think, is transaction log or XLog. My question is about CLog
in which two bits are there for each transaction which will denote the
status of transaction. Since there is XLog from which we can determine
what changes we have to redo and undo, what is the need for this CLog.

>
> > Why does a replication solution need log shipping and why cant we
> > just ship the transaction statements to a standby node?
>
> Depends on what you wish to achieve. They are two ways to a similar
> solution.
> Log shipping is part of the core code with plans to make the duplicate
> server be able to satisfy select queries.
> Statement based replication is offered by other options such as slony.
>
> Each has advantages and disadvantages. Transaction logs are part of
> normal operation and can be copied to another server in the background
> without adding load or delays to the master server.
>
> Statement based replication has added complexity of waiting for the
> slaves to duplicate the transaction and handling errors from a slave
> applying the transaction. They also tend to have restrictions when it
> comes to replicating DDL changes - implemented as triggers run from
> INSERT/UPDATE not from CREATE/ALTER TABLE.

I agree. Assuming that both master and backup are running same
versions of the server and both are in sync, why cant we just send the
command statements to standby in the main backend loop(before parsing)
and let the standby ignore the SELECT kind of statements.

I am a beginner ... plz forgive my ignorance and plz provide some
clarity so that I can understand the system better.

Thanks,
Srinivas