From: | Ekaterina Amez <ekaterina(dot)amez(at)zunibal(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Should I care about this error "failed to link /usr/bin/psql [...] exists and it is not a symlink"? |
Date: | 2019-12-03 15:34:04 |
Message-ID: | e2c8585d-4f91-8bd3-839d-f91ff644f203@zunibal.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi Tom,
El 3/12/19 a las 16:14, Tom Lane escribió:
> Ekaterina Amez <ekaterina(dot)amez(at)zunibal(dot)com> writes:
>> I'm installing postgres 9.6 in a CentOS 7 computer that already has
>> postgres v9.2 installed (version that comes with CentOS installer) and
>> I've seen the message of this mail's subject.
>> ...
>> failed to link /usr/bin/psql -> /etc/alternatives/pgsql-psql: /usr/bin/psql exists and it is not a symlink
>> ...
> I believe the issue here is that you've got Red Hat's postgresql packages
> installed,
As I've mentioned, this Postgres version comes with CentOs installation,
so I guess you're right.
> and they're not set up to participate in alternatives
> switching. I'd suggest removing those packages
By "removing those packages" you mean uninstall v9.2? This is a test
computer and it's not a problem, but I'm afraid this is going to happen
also in production server, by doing this won't be my cluster be unavailable?
> --- having them installed
> alongside PGDG postgres packages is going to lead to nothing but grief.
>
> regards, tom lane
So what's happening is that I have installed a RH version of Postgres
instead an official one? Am I right?
Regards,
Ekaterina
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-12-03 16:10:41 | Re: Should I care about this error "failed to link /usr/bin/psql [...] exists and it is not a symlink"? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-12-03 15:23:56 | Re: ERROR: cache lookup failed for type 16292881 |