From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dag Lem <dag(at)nimrod(dot)no>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: daitch_mokotoff module |
Date: | 2021-12-13 16:18:07 |
Message-ID: | e2c26668-79c5-49ca-cf84-770b1d3fed6b@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/13/21 16:05, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 12/13/21 09:26, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On 12/13/21 14:38, Dag Lem wrote:
>>> Please find attached an updated patch, with the following fixes:
>>>
>>> * Replaced remaining malloc/free with palloc/pfree.
>>> * Made "make check" pass.
>>> * Updated notes on other implementations.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, looks interesting. A couple generic comments, based on a quick
>> code review.
>>
>> 1) Can the extension be marked as trusted, just like fuzzystrmatch?
>>
>> 2) The docs really need an explanation of what the extension is for,
>> not just a link to fuzzystrmatch. Also, a couple examples would be
>> helpful, I guess - similarly to fuzzystrmatch. The last line in the
>> docs is annoyingly long.
>
>
> It's not clear to me why we need a new module for this. Wouldn't it be
> better just to add the new function to fuzzystrmatch?
>
Yeah, that's a valid point. I think we're quite conservative about
adding more contrib modules, and adding a function to an existing one
works around a lot of that.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Juan José Santamaría Flecha | 2021-12-13 16:28:47 | Re: WIN32 pg_import_system_collations |
Previous Message | John Naylor | 2021-12-13 16:02:47 | speed up text_position() for utf-8 |