Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeremy Schneider <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates
Date: 2024-07-23 20:07:49
Message-ID: e2a7c80822a496fe826f15d1af39ee5923c6c32f.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 07:39 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> we should remedy the step backward that pg_c_utf8 has taken:

Obviously I disagree that we've taken a step backwards.

Can you articulate the principle by which all of the other problems
with IMMUTABLE are just fine, but updates to Unicode are intolerable,
and only for PG_C_UTF8?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-07-23 20:18:59 Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-07-23 20:07:33 Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates