Re: [PGdocs] fix description for handling pf non-ASCII characters

Sep 26, 2023 1:10:55 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:

> "Karl O. Pinc" <kop(at)karlpinc(dot)com> writes:
>> For the last hunk you'd change around "anything".  Write:
>> "... it will be truncated to less than NAMEDATALEN characters and
>> the bytes of the string which are not printable ASCII characters ...".
>
>> Notice that I have also changed "that" to "which" just above. 
>> I _think_ this is better English.
>
> No, I'm pretty sure you're mistaken.  It's been a long time since
> high school English, but the way I think this works is that "that"
> introduces a restrictive clause, which narrows the scope of what
> you are saying.  That is, you say "that" when you want to talk
> about only the bytes of the string that aren't ASCII.  But "which"
> introduces a non-restrictive clause that adds information or
> commentary.  If you say "bytes of the string which are not ASCII",
> you are effectively making a side assertion that no byte of the
> string is ASCII.  Which is not the meaning you want here.

Makes sense to me.  "That" it is.

Thanks for the help. I never would have figured that out.