Re: Re: RE: libpq debug log

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: "Iwata, Aya" <iwata(dot)aya(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Jim Doty <jdoty(at)pivotal(dot)io>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp" <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, 'Kyotaro HORIGUCHI' <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Re: RE: libpq debug log
Date: 2019-03-15 09:58:26
Message-ID: e2812930-5b84-ae3a-3a01-4553944ce9c0@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/5/19 5:28 PM, David Steele wrote:
> On 3/5/19 11:48 AM, Iwata, Aya wrote:
>>
>> So is it alright to add these information to the new/proposed
>> PQtrace() default output?
>
> I agree with Andres [1] that it's not very clear where this patch is
> going and we should push the target to PG13.

Hearing no opinions to the contrary, I have set the target version to PG13.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-03-15 09:58:56 Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums
Previous Message Maxence Ahlouche 2019-03-15 09:57:24 Re: Show a human-readable n_distinct in pg_stats view