Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Roman Frołow <rofrol(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
Date: 2023-11-20 07:14:50
Message-ID: e23ad4ec-e03e-456d-9fa0-b681a6ab8a55@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 19.11.23 21:34, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> * Making explicit references to ISO 8601:2004 where section numbers are
> referenced. Mostly in source comments but also a couple of places in
> the docs. This is about avoiding confusion as ISO 8601:2019 has been
> published since then, with different section numbers[1]. The pre-2004
> editions also have different section numbers. References to general
> ISO 8601 concepts (e.g. week numbers) are left unchanged because those
> are not tied to any particular edition.

Maybe we should change the references to the 2019 edition instead?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Wienhold 2023-11-20 13:30:16 Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
Previous Message Erik Wienhold 2023-11-19 20:34:28 Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently