From: | "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Question on win32 semaphore simulation |
Date: | 2006-04-18 02:58:14 |
Message-ID: | e21kqr$c6j$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> wrote
> As I reviewed the win32/sema.c, there is some code that I am not clear,
can
> anybody explain please?
>
There is another problem related to concurrent operations on win32 sema. Say
two processes are doing semop(+1) concurrently. Look at this code:
/* Don't want the lock anymore */
sem_counts[sops[0].sem_num]++;
ReleaseSemaphore(cur_handle, sops[0].sem_op, NULL);
Except for the problem mentioned in the above thread that the first line
should be: sem_counts[sops[0].sem_num] += sops[0].sem_op, the sem_counts[]
are unprotected by anything, so we might lose an update. Maybe I totally
misunderstand something?
Regards,
Qingqing
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-04-18 03:40:33 | Re: schema-qualified SET CONSTRAINTS |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-04-17 22:45:27 | Re: question regarding pg_database.h and DatabaseRelationId |