| From: | "Relaxin" <me(at)yourhouse(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB? |
| Date: | 2006-04-09 14:02:26 |
| Message-ID: | e1b45b$1rcl$1@news.hub.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
That doesn't really help anwser the question...
The developers in our office (and myself) are also under the impression that
PG is a very slow database.
Also when you look thru the "performance" newsgroup, it seems to me that
what people are saying is true.
So instead of being a jerk to those of us who are a "novice" to PG, how
about giving some concrete answers to these performance questions.
> ebcorder(at)rockwellcollins(dot)com wrote:
>>
>> I know when comparison tests are performed they can be tilted on these
>> internet sites. But I see so many people declaring PostgreSQL to be the
>> slowest I am thinking where there is smoke there's fire.
"Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote in message
news:200604090338(dot)k393c8G09848(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us(dot)(dot)(dot)
>
> Lots of people still think Elvis is alive. :-)
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Relaxin | 2006-04-09 14:15:05 | Re: PostgreSQL a slow DB? |
| Previous Message | Relaxin | 2006-04-09 13:53:42 | Re: Plain ANSI C Compiled on Win32 |