| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
| Date: | 2024-03-30 01:02:40 |
| Message-ID: | e16cd9caf4f5229a152d318d70b4d323a03e3539.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2024-03-29 at 20:54 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> What’s different, given the above arguments, in making the change
> with 18 instead of now?
Acknowledged. You, Tom, and Corey (and perhaps everyone else) seem to
be aligned here, so that's consensus enough for me. Default is with
stats, --no-statistics to disable them.
> Independently, I had a thought around doing an analyze as the data is
> being loaded ..
Right, I think there are some interesting things to pursue here. I also
had an idea to use logical decoding to get a streaming sample, which
would be better randomness than block sampling. At this point that's
just an idea, I haven't looked into it seriously.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-03-30 03:22:09 | Re: Popcount optimization using AVX512 |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2024-03-30 00:54:20 | Re: Statistics Import and Export |