| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: speed up a logical replica setup |
| Date: | 2022-03-18 22:34:25 |
| Message-ID: | e0df5d73-eac8-836e-d40f-0f2688c13e16@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/15/22 09:51, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 21.02.22 13:09, Euler Taveira wrote:
>> A new tool called pg_subscriber does this conversion and is tightly
>> integrated
>> with Postgres.
>
> Are we comfortable with the name pg_subscriber? It seems too general.
> Are we planning other subscriber-related operations in the future? If
> so, we should at least make this one use a --create option or
> something like that.
Not really sold on the name (and I didn't much like the name
pglogical_create_subscriber either, although it's a cool facility and
I'm happy to see us adopting something like it).
ISTM we should have a name that conveys that we are *converting* a
replica or equivalent to a subscriber.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-03-18 22:45:03 | Re: Adding CI to our tree |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2022-03-18 22:26:39 | Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication |