| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [18] CREATE SUBSCRIPTION ... SERVER |
| Date: | 2025-02-28 23:05:10 |
| Message-ID: | e0c6fd0fa6036df36779c8bd8ae763c6f4064135.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2024-12-16 at 20:05 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 08:08 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
>
Rebased v14.
The approach has changed multiple times. It starte off with more in-
core code, but in response to review feedback, has become more
decoupled from core and more coupled to postgres_fdw.
But the patch has been about the same (just rebases) since March of
last year, and hasn't gotten feedback since. I still think it's a nice
feature, but I'd like some feedback on the externals of the feature.
As a note, this will require a version bump for postgres_fdw for the
new connection method.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v14-0001-CREATE-SUSBCRIPTION-.-SERVER.patch | text/x-patch | 45.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-02-28 23:18:29 | Re: Should work_mem be stable for a prepared statement? |
| Previous Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-02-28 22:54:36 | Re: Should work_mem be stable for a prepared statement? |