| From: | Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: slow count in window query |
| Date: | 2009-07-17 07:19:53 |
| Message-ID: | e08cc0400907170019l2bf9fdbdj328ea0ddd669def@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2009/7/17 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Hello
>
> look on:
> postgres=# explain select count(*) over () from x;
> QUERY PLAN
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> WindowAgg (cost=0.00..265.00 rows=10000 width=0)
> -> Seq Scan on x (cost=0.00..140.00 rows=10000 width=0)
> (2 rows)
>
> Time: 1,473 ms
> postgres=# explain select count(*) over (order by a) from x;
> QUERY PLAN
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WindowAgg (cost=0.00..556.25 rows=10000 width=4)
> -> Index Scan using gg on x (cost=0.00..406.25 rows=10000 width=4)
> (2 rows)
>
> but
> query1: 160ms
> query2: 72ms
Well, how about "select a from x order by a"?
I wonder if index scan affects more than windowagg.
--
Hitoshi Harada
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-07-17 07:42:02 | Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-07-17 06:20:46 | Re: navigation menu for documents |