From: | Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl> |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
Date: | 2009-04-11 12:33:16 |
Message-ID: | e08cc0400904110533l46526f12l198d3a016b4294bb@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2009/4/11 Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>:
>
> On 11 Apr 2009, at 08:01, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
>
>> 2009/4/11 David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 03:48:33PM +0900, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, but all the window functions are stored in pg_proc.
>>>
>>> So are aggregate functions, and they have their own separate way of
>>> being addressed in psql :)
>>>
>>
>> Aggregate functions are stored in pg_aggregate. And they are
>> combinations of plain function which is stored in pg_proc.
>
>
> Maybe trigger functions should be displayed separately too than ?
You don't catch the point. The aggregate entries in pg_proc have
prosrc = 'aggregate_dummy', which means they're dummy and the entities
are stored in pg_aggregate. Triggers in pg_proc are dummy? No, they
are actually plain functions with trigger return type.
Regards,
--
Hitoshi Harada
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz | 2009-04-11 12:39:47 | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-04-11 10:34:07 | Re: Allow COMMENT ON to accept an expression rather than just a string |