From: | "Hitoshi Harada" <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Dimitri Fontaine" <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Greg Stark" <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, "Tatsuo Ishii" <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch |
Date: | 2008-10-01 00:59:37 |
Message-ID: | e08cc0400809301759p2fdb53dawc5f8213dbf2dae39@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
2008/10/1 Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> Le 30 sept. 08 à 20:03, Tom Lane a écrit :
>>
>> set_read_position(tupstore, &local_read_position);
>> tuple = tuplestore_gettuple(tupstore, ...);
>> get_read_position(tupstore, &local_read_position);
>>
>> rather than just tuplestore_gettuple. The set/get functions will be
>> cheap enough that this is no big deal. (Or maybe we should just
>> provide a wrapper function that does this sequence?)
>
> It seems to me to share some ideas with the MemoryContext concept: what
> about a TupstoreContext associated with tuplestore, you get a common default
> one if you don't register your own, and use
> tuplestore_gettuple(MyTupstoreContext, ...);
>
> Maybe some other API would benefit from the idea?
>
I'm just working on tuplestore recording multiple positions for my
window function project. Attached patch is still in progress but seems
it works in a situation.
From my work, the setting/getting read position and delegate savig
positions to the caller will probably have problems, because of memory
control for saving positions and tuplestore status changing (memory ->
BufFile). Instead, I decided it'd better that we can indicate the row
number by integer.
Regards,
--
Hitoshi Harada
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
tuplestore.c.diff | text/x-patch | 6.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Darren Weber | 2008-10-01 01:10:56 | Has anyone built pgbash-7.3 against postgreSQL-8.3? |
Previous Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2008-10-01 00:44:43 | Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends |