| From: | "Jonathan Ellis" <jbellis(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Jonathan Ellis" <jbellis+ns(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #2369: pg_dump function dependencies |
| Date: | 2006-04-03 18:04:34 |
| Message-ID: | e06563880604031104p1a9a7285o25e37cdd1312c8ab@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 4/2/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> "Jonathan Ellis" <jbellis+ns(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I have many many instances of these two problems in pg_dump's output:
>
> > 1) function code don't seem to be taken into account for dependencies
>
> No, it isn't, and this should not matter because pg_dump takes care to
> turn off check_function_bodies.
Ah, that was the problem -- I manually split my dump file into two sections,
so only the first section had this set. Sorry.
BTW, what was the other problem?
>
Meh, I realized that one was a PEBKC and removed it, but forgot to fix the
preamble. Yesterday wasn't a good day for me. :)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | William Leite Arajo | 2006-04-03 21:09:50 | BUG #2372: dblink_exec doesn't return. NEVER! |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2006-04-03 16:25:52 | Re: BUG #2365: can't install |