Re: BUG #2369: pg_dump function dependencies

From: "Jonathan Ellis" <jbellis(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jonathan Ellis" <jbellis+ns(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #2369: pg_dump function dependencies
Date: 2006-04-03 18:04:34
Message-ID: e06563880604031104p1a9a7285o25e37cdd1312c8ab@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 4/2/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> "Jonathan Ellis" <jbellis+ns(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I have many many instances of these two problems in pg_dump's output:
>
> > 1) function code don't seem to be taken into account for dependencies
>
> No, it isn't, and this should not matter because pg_dump takes care to
> turn off check_function_bodies.

Ah, that was the problem -- I manually split my dump file into two sections,
so only the first section had this set. Sorry.

BTW, what was the other problem?
>

Meh, I realized that one was a PEBKC and removed it, but forgot to fix the
preamble. Yesterday wasn't a good day for me. :)

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message William Leite Arajo 2006-04-03 21:09:50 BUG #2372: dblink_exec doesn't return. NEVER!
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2006-04-03 16:25:52 Re: BUG #2365: can't install