From: | "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PANIC: heap_update_redo: no block |
Date: | 2006-03-20 11:54:17 |
Message-ID: | dvm5bj$12l$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
""Alex bahdushka"" <bahdushka(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote
>
> After doing some more digging, it looks like that server was missing
> the appropriate Kpostgresql symlink in /etc/rc0.d/. So upon shutdown
> (shutdown -h now)... my guess is it got a sigterm (you know where it
> says Sending all processes a TERM signal or whatever), then it (init)
> waited 5 seconds or whatever the timeout is and sent a sigkill.
>
> If postgresql took longer to shutdown than that timeout and so was
> then given a sigkill and then server turned off.... Could that do it?
>
I don't believe in this explaination actually. According the startup
message, the error "heap_update_redo: no block" could most possibly happen
when PostgreSQL tried to read an existing block but found that the file
length is not long enough to have it. How could a SIGKILL truncate a data
file like that?
Regards,
Qingqing
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2006-03-20 12:10:32 | Re: OpenSuse10.0 and postgresql |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2006-03-20 11:53:17 | Re: Encountering NULLS in plpgsql |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2006-03-20 12:15:53 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals --Important Update |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-03-20 11:50:35 | Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] guppie: 64MB RAM too small? |