Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update

From: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update
Date: 2006-03-18 05:14:52
Message-ID: dvg56q$2f6e$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers


"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote
>
> What would people like to hear about?
>

I am really interested in the concurrency control part of the PostgreSQL. I
can see the MVCC/lock rules there, and basically I can follow them -- but
there are so many if-else in the rules, so the problem always for me is: how
can we gaurantee that the rules are complete and correct? So I guess I may
miss a big picture somewhere.

Regards,
Qingqing

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-03-18 06:37:53 Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-03-18 03:03:58 Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-03-18 05:59:16 Re: Automatically setting work_mem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-03-18 03:03:58 Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update