Re: Why pgAdmin III guru suggests VACUUM in 8.1

From: "Andrus" <eetasoft(at)online(dot)ee>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why pgAdmin III guru suggests VACUUM in 8.1
Date: 2005-11-22 19:33:34
Message-ID: dlvrrj$gur$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jim,

> Upsizes? Are you adding more data? If so then yes, analyze would be
> good, though autovacuum should handle it for you.

I create new Postgres database, upsize a lot of data into it. After that
this database goes online and will receive a lot of transactions daily.
I'm using PG 8.1 default postgres.conf file.

I read than autovacuum may skip some tables which can cause wrong guru
hints.

So it seems that I should run manually VACUUM ANALYZE for the whole database
once for initial statistics colection of those tables, isn't it?

Andrus.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-11-22 20:59:05 Re: Why pgAdmin III guru suggests VACUUM in 8.1
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-11-22 19:12:51 Re: Why pgAdmin III guru suggests VACUUM in 8.1