From: | Nicolay A Vasiliev <nvasiliev(at)whiteriversoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PL language selection |
Date: | 2005-11-10 11:51:47 |
Message-ID: | dkvc8k$dh6$1@sea.gmane.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:16:12PM +0300, Nicolay A Vasiliev wrote:
>
>>There are a number of different PL-languages. How do you select these
>>languages? I think PL/SQL is more fast or am I wrong?
>>
>>Suggest me please your way of PL language selection.
>
>
> Well, it kind of depends on what you want to do. Different languages
> are good for different things. If you want pattern matching you might
> want pl/perl.
Oh, great! It sounds good cause we use Perl hardly in our work and
understand something in this language :).
> For simple SQL stuff, pl/sql has the advantage that it
> can be inlined. pl/pgsql looks similar to oracles offering, some people
> like that.
I thought the same. When I worked with Sybase Adaptive SQL Anywhere few
years ago I liked its Watcom SQL dialect for its power of computation
possibilities.
>
> The languages are all fast enough that you should really consider
> maintainability, readabilty and coding experience before speed...
This is very important especially in case of active using of database in
insert/update conditions. And I thought PL/SQL is more "native". If they
are equally by maintainability - so, PosgreSQL is fine a lot :).
Regards,
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nicolay A Vasiliev | 2005-11-10 11:55:01 | Re: PL language selection |
Previous Message | Piechu Piechu | 2005-11-10 11:46:33 | Time trigger |