Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?

From: "Andrus" <eetasoft(at)online(dot)ee>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?
Date: 2005-10-07 14:06:11
Message-ID: di5ve8$185j$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


"Douglas McNaught" <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> wrote in message
news:m2br21zd2l(dot)fsf(at)Douglas-McNaughts-Powerbook(dot)local(dot)(dot)(dot)
> "Andrus" <eetasoft(at)online(dot)ee> writes:
>
>> Apache runs well in Windows 98. Why this is so difficult in native
>> Windows
>> Postgres?
>
> I *think* it's because we use certain features of NTFS, which Win98
> will never support.

Postgres runs also in FAT32 file system , so this cannot be problem.

Problem may be service support.
Apache runs in Windows 98 as usual application, not as service. So this can
be done in Postgres also.

Andrus.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrus 2005-10-07 14:07:03 Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-07 13:29:37 Re: SELECT FOR SHARE