From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Anthony Roberts <anthony(dot)roberts(at)linaro(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Lina Iyer <lina(dot)iyer(at)linaro(dot)org>, Mike Holmes <mike(dot)holmes(at)linaro(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support |
Date: | 2024-09-28 13:01:15 |
Message-ID: | dfc7a547-f28e-4325-849e-ca1730007647@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2024-09-24 Tu 2:31 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 16:28, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 12:52, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2024-02-13 12:49:33 -0500, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > > I think I might have been on to something - if my human
> emulation of a
> > > preprocessor isn't wrong, we'd end up with
> > >
> > > #define S_UNLOCK(lock) \
> > > do { _ReadWriteBarrier(); (*(lock)) = 0; } while (0)
> > >
> > > on msvc + arm. And that's entirely insufficient -
> _ReadWriteBarrier() just
> > > limits *compiler* level reordering, not CPU level
> reordering. I think it's
> > > even insufficient on x86[-64], but it's definitely
> insufficient on arm.
> > >
> > In fact ReadWriteBarrier has been deprecated
> _ReadWriteBarrier | Microsoft
> > Learn
> >
> <https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/intrinsics/readwritebarrier?view=msvc-170>
>
> I'd just ignore that, that's just pushing towards more modern
> stuff that's
> more applicable to C++ than C.
>
>
> > I did try using atomic_thread_fence as per atomic_thread_fence -
> > cppreference.com <http://cppreference.com>
> > <https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/atomic/atomic_thread_fence>
>
> The semantics of atomic_thread_fence are, uh, very odd. I'd
> just use
> MemoryBarrier().
>
> #defineS_UNLOCK(lock) \
> do{ MemoryBarrier(); (*(lock)) =0; } while(0)
> #endif
> Has no effect.
>
> I have no idea if that is what you meant that I should do ?
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> Revisiting this:
>
> Andrew, can you explain the difference between ninja test (which
> passes) and what the build farm does. The buildfarm crashes.
The buildfarm client performs these steps:
meson test -C $pgsql --no-rebuild --suite setup
meson test -t $meson_test_timeout $jflag -C $pgsql --logbase checklog --print-errorlogs --no-rebuild --suite regress --test-args=--no-locale
meson test -t $meson_test_timeout $jflag -C $pgsql --print-errorlogs --no-rebuild --logbase checkworld --no-suite setup --no-suite regress
foreach tested locale: meson test -t $meson_test_timeout $jflag -v -C $pgsql --no-rebuild --print-errorlogs --setup running --suite regress-running --logbase regress-installcheck-$locale
$pgsql is the build root, $jflag is setting the number of jobs
IOW, we do test suite setup, run the core regression tests, run all the
remaining non-install tests, then run the install tests for each locale.
We don't call ninja directly, but I don't see why that should make a
difference.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2024-09-28 13:50:29 | msys inet_pton strangeness |
Previous Message | Junwang Zhao | 2024-09-28 11:52:00 | Re: general purpose array_sort |