From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
Date: | 2017-08-07 18:42:42 |
Message-ID: | df438697-08b2-008c-eb55-4db730b76337@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 8/7/17 13:51, Tom Lane wrote:
> At this point I'm thinking that really what we ought to do is deprecate
> using any pre-53 ICU release for Postgres. It is very clear that those
> versions are an entirely different beast from 53-and-up, and that they
> are now abandonware so far as ICU upstream is concerned.
Maybe a note in the documentation to that effect would be useful.
I don't think we should prevent the use of older ICU versions in the
code. That would probably annoy people who are forced to develop or
test their applications on older platforms.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-07 18:45:47 | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-08-07 18:05:54 | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-07 18:45:47 | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-07 18:36:33 | Re: xmltable SQL conformance |