Re: Installing module for 9.6, not 9.2, on Centos?

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Installing module for 9.6, not 9.2, on Centos?
Date: 2017-05-24 02:12:21
Message-ID: df364c34-b872-678a-37f4-8f97187b3a3f@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 5/23/2017 4:54 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:
> But the install still goes to 9.2:
>
> PATH=/usr/local/pgsql96/bin/:$PATH make USE_PGXS=1 install
> |
> /bin/mkdir -p '/usr/pgsql-9.2/share/contrib'

earlier you said something about /usr/pgsql-9.6/bin ... is it that, or
is it /usr/local/pgsql96/bin ?

does

/usr/pgsql-9.6/bin/pg_config

output a whole pile of directory assignments that make sense ?

or does

/usr/local/pgsql96/bin/pg_config

do that?

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Igor Korot 2017-05-24 02:45:13 Re: Have just libpg installer
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2017-05-24 01:06:21 Re: Installing module for 9.6, not 9.2, on Centos?