Re: Postgresql replication

From: William Yu <wyu(at)talisys(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql replication
Date: 2005-08-25 12:03:24
Message-ID: dekc2c$1pqm$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

As far as I know, nobody has a generic solution for multi-master
replication where servers are not in close proximity. Single master
replication? Doable. Application specific conflict resolution? Doable.
Off the shelf package that somehow knows financial transactions on a
server shouldn't be duplicated on another? Uhh...I'd be wary of trying
it out myself.

Bohdan Linda wrote:
> I would have a slight offtopic question, this is issue only of pgsql or
> there are some other db solutions which have good performance when doing
> this kind of replication across the world.
>
> Regards,
> Bohdan
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:01:49AM +0200, William Yu wrote:
>
>>It provides pseudo relief if all your servers are in the same building.
>>Having a front-end pgpool connector pointing to servers across the world
>>is not workable -- performance ends up being completely decrepit due to
>>the high latency.
>>
>>Which is the problem we face. Great, you've got multiple servers for
>>failover. Too bad it doesn't do much good if your building gets hit by
>>fire/earthquake/hurricane/etc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message William Yu 2005-08-25 12:24:53 Re: Postgresql replication
Previous Message Tino Wildenhain 2005-08-25 11:50:48 Re: Postgresql replication