Re: 10.0

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10.0
Date: 2016-06-14 21:15:27
Message-ID: dec90bc5-8783-3e4d-cc68-8e9b79fd014b@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/14/16 3:38 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 06/14/2016 12:46 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
>
>> Any ideas on naming for such a function? version_detail()? I suppose
>> while we're at this we might as well provide the compile details as well.
>
> version(detail) or version(verbose)

I don't think that makes as much sense as a different function name,
since the output is fundamentally different than version().
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461

In response to

  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-06-14 20:38:44 from Joshua D. Drake

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2016-06-14 21:35:00 Re: Use of index for 50% column restriction
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2016-06-14 21:13:52 Re: 10.0