Re: Problem with performance using query with unnest after migrating from V9.1 to V9.2 and higher

From: "Knels, Udo" <U(dot)Knels(at)treubuch-it(dot)de>
To: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with performance using query with unnest after migrating from V9.1 to V9.2 and higher
Date: 2016-09-22 12:39:30
Message-ID: de4134e10aa14dbeb7e0850ccfc4ae73@EXCH-1.ddd-do.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi,

I tried the following on the upgraded database:
analyze schema_test.table_a;

But the result is the same.

https://explain.depesz.com/s/hsx5

"Sort (cost=5.94..6.01 rows=26 width=6) (actual time=0.199..0.200 rows=3 loops=1)"
" Sort Key: table_a.col0002"
" Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB"
" Buffers: shared hit=1"
" -> HashAggregate (cost=5.07..5.33 rows=26 width=6) (actual time=0.161..0.163 rows=3 loops=1)"
" Group Key: table_a.col0002"
" Buffers: shared hit=1"
" -> Hash Semi Join (cost=2.76..4.95 rows=50 width=6) (actual time=0.070..0.133 rows=26 loops=1)"
" Hash Cond: ((table_a.col0001)::text = (unnest('{5010010000}'::text[])))"
" Buffers: shared hit=1"
" -> Seq Scan on table_a (cost=0.00..1.50 rows=50 width=17) (actual time=0.015..0.034 rows=50 loops=1)"
" Buffers: shared hit=1"
" -> Hash (cost=1.51..1.51 rows=100 width=32) (actual time=0.028..0.028 rows=1 loops=1)"
" Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 9kB"
" -> Result (cost=0.00..0.51 rows=100 width=0) (actual time=0.015..0.017 rows=1 loops=1)"
"Planning time: 0.653 ms"
"Execution time: 0.326 ms"

Greetings

Udo Knels
treubuch IT GmbH

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sven R. Kunze 2016-09-22 13:24:49 Multiple-Table-Spanning Joins with ORs in WHERE Clause
Previous Message Mike Broers 2016-09-22 04:09:12 Re: query against single partition uses index, against master table does seq scan