From: | Jamie Fox <jfox(at)directcommerce(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | large object does not exist after pg_migrator |
Date: | 2009-07-13 21:13:37 |
Message-ID: | de22a6520907131413w574c5bc8g5fed79be163fdc1a@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hi -
After what seemed to be a normal successful pg_migrator migration from 8.3.7
to 8.4.0, in either link or copy mode, vacuumlo fails on both our production
and qa databases:
Jul 1 11:17:03 db2 postgres[9321]: [14-1] LOG: duration: 175.563 ms
statement: DELETE FROM vacuum_l WHERE lo IN (SELECT "xml_data" FROM
"public"."xml_user")
Jul 1 11:17:03 db2 postgres[9321]: [15-1] ERROR: large object 17919608
does not exist
Jul 1 11:17:03 db2 postgres[9321]: [16-1] ERROR: current transaction is
aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block
I migrated our qa database using pg_dump/pg_restore and vacuumlo has no
problem with it. When I try querying the two databases for large objects
manually I see the same error in the one that was migrated with pg_migrator:
select loread(lo_open(xml_data,262144),1073741819) from xml_user where id =
'10837246';
ERROR: large object 24696063 does not exist
SQL state: 42704
I can also see that the pg_largeobject table is different, in the pg_restore
version the Rows (estimated) is 316286 and Rows (counted) is the same, in
the pg_migrator version the Rows (counted) is only 180507.
Any advice on what I might look for to try and track down this problem?
pg_restore on our production database takes too long so it would be really
nice to use pg_migrator instead.
Thanks,
Jamie
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | benoît carpentier | 2009-07-13 21:25:38 | Benetl, a free ETL tool for files using postgreSQL, is out in version 2.9 |
Previous Message | Dan Armbrust | 2009-07-13 20:53:57 | Re: Checkpoint Tuning Question |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-07-13 21:36:04 | final preparations for CommitFest 2009-07 |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2009-07-13 21:02:51 | Re: [RFC] obtaining the function call stack |