Re: pg_get_prepared?

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_get_prepared?
Date: 2005-07-15 14:19:19
Message-ID: dd98b662f6fb5f9beeed2242ac29fd17@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> The use case is when you want to prepare a query, but only if it's not
> already prepared on that connection.

This has been covered before, but to reiterate: why would you need this?
Any application worth its salt should be tracking which statements it
has already prepared (after all, they cannot span connections). Seems
a waste of resources to make a separate call to the database for
information you should already know.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200507151017
https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEARECAAYFAkLXxcsACgkQvJuQZxSWSsgJOgCg+jKQzGW+Xgh+4rAooS01jxse
fa0AnRG5ODx2N0gc8BG3LeYAYUVmICJX
=eLkO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-07-15 14:31:57 Re: multibyte regression tests
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-07-15 14:07:37 Re: pg_get_prepared?