From: | Ron Johnson <rjohnson(at)rjohnson(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)chapelperilous(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Cross-database tables |
Date: | 2001-01-07 03:12:29 |
Message-ID: | dd7d79a7551b354f9a2e30bd0ab17c4b.2Ns9qoTqQqDyi@rjohnson.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Brett W. McCoy is thought to have said:
> Is this the same as what in SQL92 are known as 'logical schemas' (versus
> the physical schema)? They aren't supported yet in PostgreSQL, but are in
> the TODO list, according to http://www.postgresql.org/docs/todo.html,
Thanks. I didn't think to look in that list for some reason. Same list
contains a few other things I've been looking for too, but didn't know
what to call them.
I did find it kinda funny that it's listed under "exotic", though.
Eh, it's a good, solid database. I'll find a way around it till someone
good at writing databases sits down and thinks "Drats, I could really use
one of those exotic logical schemas to access multiple tables from
multiple databases right about now. Why -- I'll write one!". ;)
Thanks.
--
RJohnson.com -+- Ron Johnson <rjohnson(at)rjohnson(dot)com>
http://www2.rjohnson.com/me/2Ns9qoTqQqDyi/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2001-01-08 08:06:45 | Re: MSSQL to PgSQL |
Previous Message | Brett W. McCoy | 2001-01-07 02:25:13 | Re: Cross-database tables |