Re: Operation log for major operations

From: Dmitry Koval <d(dot)koval(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Ted Yu <yuzhihong(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Operation log for major operations
Date: 2023-01-25 08:35:24
Message-ID: dd621eb3-b532-25e2-59d7-101861ce9322@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi!

> Maybe another discussion thread can be created for the consolidation of
> XX_file_exists functions.

Usually XX_file_exists functions are simple. They contain single call
stat() or open() and specific error processing after this call.

Likely the unified function will be too complex to cover all the uses of
XX_file_exists functions.

--
With best regards,
Dmitry Koval

Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2023-01-25 08:43:15 Re: document the need to analyze partitioned tables
Previous Message Katsuragi Yuta 2023-01-25 08:15:10 Re: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure