From: | Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Patrick Krecker <pkrecker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TODO list (was Re: Contributing with code) |
Date: | 2018-01-03 09:07:28 |
Message-ID: | dd067805-ed77-d55a-35b1-c0cb9f9830a4@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/03/2018 03:50 AM, David Rowley wrote:
> On 3 January 2018 at 13:12, Patrick Krecker <pkrecker(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> As a person looking to become a postgres contributor, perhaps I can
>> offer some perspective on this. I think there is value in providing
>> *some* starting point for new contributors in the form of concrete
>> problems to solve. The value I hope to extract from the time spent on
>> my first feature comes mostly from the learning experience and not
>> from the acceptance of the feature itself. I would not be upset if my
>> work was never accepted as long as I understand why. I expect most
>> people picking features at random from a TODO list would have a
>> similar outlook on their first contribution.
>
> I agree with this. It was about 10 years ago when I first looked at
> the TODO list and thought "I could do that!", so I did. I got lucky
> and it was accepted, but without that list, I'd probably never have
> written the patch and probably not be here today.
I, too, came in through the TODO list.
--
Vik Fearing +33 6 46 75 15 36
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-01-03 09:59:12 | Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support |
Previous Message | Cyril Auburtin | 2018-01-03 09:05:29 | tsquery pre-parser |