| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Date: | 2016-10-27 02:08:24 |
| Message-ID: | dce7bde4-f2b8-59a6-71fd-d5357ac1c990@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016/10/27 3:13, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I will include these changes in the next version of patches I will post
>> soon in reply to [1].
>> [1]
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoYJcUTcN7vVgg54GHtffH11JJWYZnfF4KiRxjV-iaACQg%40mail.gmail.com
>
> How soon? Tempus fugit, and tempus in this release cycle fugit
> particularly quickly. It looks like the last revision of these
> patches was on October 7th, and that's now more than 2 weeks ago. We
> need to get moving here if this is going to happen this cycle.
Sorry about the delay, I'll post no later than tomorrow.
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karl O. Pinc | 2016-10-27 03:25:13 | Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function |
| Previous Message | Tsunakawa, Takayuki | 2016-10-27 01:59:57 | Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? |