From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions |
Date: | 2010-03-23 20:10:03 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d11003231310p5d110679n2e0cd0d3e61e08f3@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> writes:
>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:47:30PM -0500, Andy Colson wrote:
>>> (I added the "and trust" as an after thought, because I do have one very
>>> important 100% uptime required mysql database that is running. Its my
>>> MythTV box at home, and I have to ask permission from my GF before I take
>>> the box down to upgrade anything. And heaven forbid if it crashes or
>>> anything. So I do have experience with care and feeding of mysql. And no,
>>> I'm not kidding.)
>
>> Andy, you are so me! I have the exact same one-and-only-one mission
>> critical mysql DB, but the gatekeeper is my wife. And experience with
>> that instance has made me love and trust PostgreSQL even more.
>
> So has anyone looked at porting MythTV to PG?
Or SQLite. I'm guessing that most loads on it are single threaded.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bhella Paramjeet-PFCW67 | 2010-03-23 20:54:37 | tuning auto vacuum for highly active tables |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-03-23 19:22:01 | Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions |