Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Yang Zhang <yanghatespam(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Igor Neyman <ineyman(at)perceptron(dot)com>, Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com>, Frank Heikens <frankheikens(at)mac(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL
Date: 2010-02-22 23:51:48
Message-ID: dcc563d11002221551m6ae5e742j889521648213dbeb@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Yang Zhang <yanghatespam(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Igor Neyman <ineyman(at)perceptron(dot)com> wrote:
>> When in doubt - test.
>> Why not remove index in MySQL (or create index in PostgreSQL) and see
>> what happens.
>> Why trying compare "apples and oranges"?
>
> Continue reading this thread -- I also tried using an index in Postgresql.

But have you tried cranking up work_mem to say 1G?

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2010-02-22 23:52:19 Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL
Previous Message Ben Chobot 2010-02-22 23:21:42 Re: tuning bgwriter in 8.4.2