From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fernando Hevia <fhevia(at)ip-tel(dot)com(dot)ar> |
Cc: | Pierre Frédéric Caillaud <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: new server I/O setup |
Date: | 2010-01-15 21:42:26 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d11001151342l6845e733w5f552aa774b113b6@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
2010/1/15 Fernando Hevia <fhevia(at)ip-tel(dot)com(dot)ar>:
>
>
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> De: Pierre Frédéric Caillaud
>> Enviado el: Viernes, 15 de Enero de 2010 15:00
>> Para: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
>> Asunto: Re: [PERFORM] new server I/O setup
>>
>>
>> No-one has mentioned SSDs yet ?...
>>
>
> The post is about an already purchased server just delivered to my office. I
> have been following with interest posts about SSD benchmarking but no SSD
> have been bought this oportunity and we have no budget to buy them either,
> at least not in the foreseable future.
And no matter how good they look on paper, being one of the first
people to use and in effect test them in production can be very
exciting. And sometimes excitement isn't what you really want from
your production servers.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-01-15 21:55:08 | Re: New server to improve performance on our large and busy DB - advice? (v2) |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2010-01-15 21:38:53 | Re: New server to improve performance on our large and busy DB - advice? (v2) |