| From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Adrian Klaver <aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net>, Filip Rembiałkowski <plk(dot)zuber(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Ralph Graulich <ralph(dot)graulich(at)t-online(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2) |
| Date: | 2009-12-22 01:12:25 |
| Message-ID: | dcc563d10912211712r7d1b0b99kd31731ac495e14a@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Then you should see BOTH tables with the same name in different
>> schemas, right? Cause the OP was saying that it picks only the first
>> one to display.
>
> Well, yes, because only the first one is visible. The second one is
> masked by the first.
But the docs say that ALL objects in the schema path will be shown.
So, my point stands, either the docs are wrong, or the behaviour is.
I'd think it's the docs.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-22 01:14:26 | Re: \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-22 01:10:59 | Re: \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2) |