| From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project |
| Date: | 2009-12-18 03:28:44 |
| Message-ID: | dcc563d10912171928h12c92160pcd4c7b75e3b9e2f6@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:51 PM, David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> wrote:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>
>> I would recommend using a traffic shaping router (like the one built
>> into the linux kernel and controlled by tc / iptables) to simulate a
>> long distance connection and testing this yourself to see which
>> replication engine will work best for you.
>>
>
> Netem :
> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/netem
> We used this to make a test rig for Directory Server replication, to verify
> a
> re-design that added pipelining to the replication protocol.
> It's already in the modern Linuxes--just needs to be configured.
Wow, everytime I turn around someone's built something cool from a set
of small sharp tools. Thanks!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Popowich | 2009-12-18 05:18:40 | order of trigger firing relative to column/table constraints |
| Previous Message | David Boreham | 2009-12-18 02:51:08 | Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project |