| From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Updating column on row update |
| Date: | 2009-11-24 18:54:37 |
| Message-ID: | dcc563d10911241054p9307a5fg52b4581420615b3f@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> But actually I thought we had more or less concluded that CREATE OR
>>> REPLACE LANGUAGE would be acceptable (perhaps only if it's given
>>> without any extra args?).
>
>> I'm not sure there's any value in that restriction - seems more
>> confusing than helpful.
>
> The point would be to reduce the risk that you're changing the language
> definition in a surprising way. Extra args would imply that you're
> trying to install a non-default definition of the language.
But if you'd installed it that way before, wouldn't you then need the
arguments this time to have them match?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-11-24 19:07:56 | Re: [HACKERS] Updating column on row update |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-11-24 18:34:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Updating column on row update |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2009-11-24 18:55:15 | Re: garbage in psql -l |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2009-11-24 18:54:29 | Re: garbage in psql -l |