Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Schnabel <schnabelr(at)missouri(dot)edu>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, cb <cb(at)mythtech(dot)net>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?
Date: 2009-11-16 20:15:34
Message-ID: dcc563d10911161215i7f523007gd832ebc49d57b457@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Power supplies / UPSes fail far more often than one might think.  And
> a db that doesn't come back up afterwards is not to be placed into
> production.

Note that there are uses for databases that can lose everything and
just initdb and be happy. Session databases are like that. But I'm
talking persistent databases.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2009-11-16 20:20:12 Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2009-11-16 20:12:00 Re: Is Diskeeper Automatic Mode safe?