Re: Re: Bench marking performance or experience using Solid State Disk Drives (SSD) with postgres

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Tyler <stephen(at)stephen-tyler(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Bench marking performance or experience using Solid State Disk Drives (SSD) with postgres
Date: 2009-11-06 06:05:32
Message-ID: dcc563d10911052205i14202d74s4d9dde568070477@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Stephen Tyler <stephen(at)stephen-tyler(dot)com> wrote:
> So far I have encountered zero errors on the SSD drives, and SMART
> status is OK.  The SCSI U320 15K drives have given a few soft errors
> over the past few years.

Have you noticed any fall off in performance as they get re-written a
lot? I'm wondering just how much of the issues with fragmentation
have been fixed versus just putting the problem further into the
future...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-11-06 06:14:39 Re: MD5 Authentication
Previous Message John DeSoi 2009-11-06 05:27:55 Re: MD5 Authentication