From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Duffey <tduffey(at)techbydesign(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: VMWare file system / database corruption |
Date: | 2009-09-21 17:40:33 |
Message-ID: | dcc563d10909211040t653f806ao9edc284382959288@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Tom Duffey <tduffey(at)techbydesign(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We're having numerous problems with a PostgreSQL 8.3.7 database running on a
> virtual Linux server w/VMWare ESX. This is not by choice and I have been
> asking the operator of this equipment for details about the disk setup and
> here's what I got:
>
> "We have a SAN that is presenting an NFS share. VMWare sees that share and
> reads the VMDK file that make up the virtual file system."
>
> Does anyone with a better understanding of PostgreSQL and VMWare know if
> this is an unreliable setup for PostgreSQL? I see things like "NFS" and
> "VMWare" and start to get worried.
I see VMWare and thing performance issues, I see NFS and thing dear
god help us all. Even if properly setup NFS is a problem waiting to
happen, and it's not reliable storage for a database in my opinion.
That said, lots of folks do it. Ask for the NFS mount options from
the sysadmin.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-09-21 17:44:15 | Re: Storage of Foreign Keys |
Previous Message | Tom Duffey | 2009-09-21 17:09:58 | VMWare file system / database corruption |