Re: NAS

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: Marco Fortina <marco(dot)fortina(at)bsc(dot)it>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: NAS
Date: 2009-09-18 01:28:46
Message-ID: dcc563d10909171828j2aa961e7hee16a43b879aa6ce@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 5:53 PM, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:

> afaik, postgresql doesn't 'certify' anything, and certainly most of us on
> this email list do not speak for postgresql.org, we're mostly just users.

However, many of us on the list ARE certifiable. But that's a different story.

In response to

  • Re: NAS at 2009-09-17 23:53:29 from John R Pierce

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan Harahush 2009-09-18 02:37:38 Re: haversine formula with postgreSQL
Previous Message John R Pierce 2009-09-17 23:53:29 Re: NAS